Hello and Welcome to MentalShavings.com

Every day, we’re confronted by thousands of messages imploring us to think or act in a certain way. Not just from marketers. But from our friends, colleagues and loved ones, too.

Why do some of those succeed, why do most fail miserably, and what does it tell us about how to get more done by communicating more persuasively?

That’s the stuff of strategic communications. That’s the stuff of Frank J. Oswald’s Mental Shavings. Weigh in with your comments. Or drop me a note at frank@frankoswald.com.

All opinions expressed on Mental Shavings are solely my own.

 



Search
Reader Comments
Login
Powered by Squarespace
Masthead Design

Original art and masthead design for Mental Shavings by Jen McCleary.

Batto Sphera Recte


Batto Sphera Recte? Perhaps you’ve seen this bumper sticker around town, and asked yourself, “What the heck is that?” Well, here’s the answer. 

« The Paradox of the Over-Informed Electorate | Main | Teach Your Mentees Well »
Wednesday
Feb012012

Who’s Fracking Whom?

(c) Josh Fox, International Wow Company

The documentary “Gasland” didn’t win an Academy Award, but it certainly deserves a Palme d’Or for changing the nation’s conversation about natural gas.

Before “Gasland,” opposition to hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) was downright inert. Today, the debate is as incendiary as the fiery faucet the movie made famous.

Watch the trailer here, if you’re new to the issue. (Or skip to 2:15, if you just want to see how the guy makes out.) 

The image above stuck with me, as it does most people. But gas proponents suggest the blazing spigot was caused by naturally occurring methane, not by fracking as the movie implies. 

So whom should I believe: the director Josh Fox (who is working on “Gasland 2”); the natural gas industry (which has released its own cliché-ridden video); the government; environmental groups; domestic energy lobbyists; CNN; or maybe FOX News? 

Frankly, I can’t tell who’s fracking whom, because each of these sources has a reason to lie, deceive or—at the very least—stretch the truth.

Alas, the one (seemingly) objective resource I can find—this November 2011 Scientific American article—is locked up behind a pay wall. (C’mon SA; it’s the 21st century.)

Most people don’t want to work that hard to find “the truth,” so they’re more likely to side with the source that is most aligned with their other values and personal beliefs. 

Communicators beware: The mediator has become the message. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>